What the Hell can I Eat?

Entries from July 2008

Is Meat the biggest Eco-Fiend?

July 31, 2008 · 1 Comment

Though I do enjoy my summer grilling I’m a strong advocate for humanely raised (and “processed”) livestock, allowed to live a free, outdoor life up until the very end. But there’s another point furiously entering the “To Meat, or Not to Meat” fracas and it’s one of global proportions: Is meat simply too costly to our planet for us to continue such mass consumption of it?

While much of the debate centers around the hideous practices of large-scale commercial farms, it seems that all livestock exacts a pretty heavy toll on our environment: One study last year by the National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science in Japan estimated that 2.2 pounds of beef is responsible for the equivalent amount of carbon dioxide emitted by the average European car every 155 miles, and burns enough energy to light a 100-watt bulb for nearly 20 days.

READ MORE HERE

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/weekinreview/27bittman.html?fta=y

Categories: Uncategorized

Franken-sugar coming soon!

July 30, 2008 · 2 Comments

So, you know that sweet stuff isn’t so healthy, but you figure “hey, at least I’ll stick to real sugar and not high fructose corn syrup if I’m gonna indulge”, right?

Guess what? Now there’s yet another thing to ask yourself: Do you know where your sugar came from???

The latest insult to our bodies comes from (oh surprise!), that clever devil Monsanto, which has somehow managed ($$$) to get the USDA to deregulate their genetically modified sugar beets.

*(Thanks for the tip Rebecca!)

Man, there really is NOTHING protecting us anymore, is there?

Read HERE

http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSN2359954920080123

And HERE

http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/news/ng.asp?n=82783-monsanto-gmo-sugar-beet-usda

Categories: Baby Free & Clear · Burning in Hell · Organic Panic · Planet Plan
Tagged:

Fast Food really does make you Fat Faster

July 25, 2008 · 3 Comments

Does Fructose Make You Fatter?
High-fructose corn syrup, a thick, gloopy, man-made sweetener used in many processed foods ranging from sodas to baked goods, has dominated sugar as an ingredient in “convenience” foods in U.S. and is growing more ubiquitous due to the fact that it’s cheaper and sweeter than regular sugar.

Now, new research suggests that it can also make you fatter.

[Today's NYTs reported that] in a small study, Texas researchers showed that the body converts fructose to body fat with “surprising speed,’’ said Elizabeth Parks, associate professor of clinical nutrition at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.

The study, which appears in The Journal of Nutrition, shows how glucose and fructose, which are forms of sugar, are metabolized differently.

In humans, triglycerides, which are a type of fat in the blood, are mostly formed in the liver. Dr. Parks said the liver acts like “a traffic cop” who coordinates how the body uses dietary sugars. When the liver encounters glucose, it decides whether the body needs to store it, burn it for energy or turn it into triglycerides.

But when fructose enters the body, it bypasses the process and ends up being quickly converted to body fat.

Read the whole piece HERE:

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/does-fructose-make-you-fatter/?em&ex=1217131200&en=8138730285365927&ei=5087%0A

Read the STUDY HERE:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18492831?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

Categories: Baby Free & Clear · Burning in Hell · Organic Panic · Planet Plan
Tagged:

An Ancient cure-all proves it’s might

July 24, 2008 · 3 Comments

For thousands of years, since Cleopatra and before, honey has been talked about as an ‘elixir’ of miraculous proportions.

It’s been said to settle coughs, aide digestion, treat burns, make skin glow and even help fight infections.

    Well guess what? It really does!

A new product, called Medihoney, is said to kill resistant bacteria better than antibiotics.
Made from an absorbent material based on seaweed, and saturated with a variety of honey known as manuka, or Leptospermum, honey, the product is currently being used in hospitals, doctors’ offices and other medical settings in both North and South America. Similar products have been popular in Australia, New Zealand and Europe for more than 10 years.

The honey is produced by bees that have collected nectar from manuka and jelly bushes, which grow in Australia and New Zealand.

According to the New Jersey-based Derma Sciences, which manufactures Medihoney, it is “the first honey-based product cleared for use by Health Canada and also the first cleared for use by the FDA. These unique dressings contain Active Leptospermum Honey, indigenous to New Zealand (Manuka) and Australia (Jellybush). The dressings can be used in all phases of wound healing and could be considered a key dressing in any wound bed preparation protocol. These qualities can help to take much of the guesswork out of wound management.”

Manuka Honey Kills Resistant Superbug Bacteria that Antibiotics Can’t

Biochemist Peter Molan, who has researched natural antibiotics including honey for 25 years, has stated that manuka honey is effective at killing even the most antibiotic resistant bacteria even when it has been diluted to a tenth of its original concentration.

“There’s more evidence, clinical evidence, by far for honey in wound treatment than for any of the pharmaceutical products,” Molan has said. He recommends it in particular for people with weak immune systems.

“It’s been used on wounds where nothing else will work,”.

The honey-based dressings are effective at absorbing fluids and killing germs for up to a week, making them ideal in settings where it is difficult to change dressings regularly. They also reduce inflammation and foul wound odors better than traditional, pharmaceutical-based dressings.

Emergency physician Craig Lambrecht stated that he began using a manuka-honey based dressing to treat children with severe burns at a military clinic in Iraq last winter. The honey dressings soon became more popular with Iraqi families than conventional dressings because they were more natural and easier to use. In addition, Lambrecht found that the children treated with honey healed faster and experienced fewer complications than children treated with conventional dressings.

“I would use the Medihoney on burns on my children, as the first choice, without question,” Lambrecht has said.

For more infor, read here:
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/48330.php

Also in the news:
Honey Better Than Cough Medicine For Soothing Kids’ Cough Symptoms

    • Honey has a long history of use as a treatment for upper respiratory symptoms, and research suggests that it also contains antioxidant and antifungal properties.
  • According to a new study conducted by researchers at the Penn State College of Medicine and published in the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine.

    “Honey provided the greatest relief of symptoms compared with the other treatments,” lead researcher Ian Paul said.

    Researchers studied 105 children between the ages of two and 18 who were having trouble sleeping due to cough. The participants were given either a small dose of buckwheat honey, honey-flavored dextromethorphan or no treatment at all a half-hour before bed.

    Dextromethorphan is the primary cough-suppressant in most over-the-counter cough and cold medications.

    Children who were given the honey had less frequent and severe nighttime coughing than either the children given dextromethorphan or those given no treatment at all. Honey appeared to induce a brief period of hyperactivity in the children, but even so both children and parents slept better after children were given honey compared with dextromethorphan or no treatment.

    “The World Health Organization has cited honey as a potential therapy,” Paul said.

    In contrast, the FDA recently advised against the use of over-the-counter cough and cold medications in children under the age of six, saying that such medications may cause dangerous side effects and have not been proven effective in that age group.

    “With honey, parents now have a safe and effective alternative to use for children over age one who have cough and cold symptoms,” Paul said.

    Paul warned that children under the age of one should not be given honey, as it may induce infant botulism in rare cases. He also noted that the experiment used dark honey, and it is not known if different varieties of honey would have the same effect.
    HERE, a link to the Penn State press release:

Categories: Baby Free & Clear · Organic Panic · Planet Plan
Tagged:

Dreaming of that bouncing baby Boy?

July 21, 2008 · Leave a Comment

    As if you needed one more reason to avoid PCBs! But here it is, from today’s NYT:

July 22, 2008
Vital Signs
Risks: High PCB Levels, Fewer Births of Boys

By NICHOLAS BAKALAR
Women exposed to high levels of polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, are significantly less likely to give birth to boys, according to a new study.

PCBs, which have been associated with various negative health effects, have been banned in the United States since 1977, but they persist in meats, eggs, dairy products and fish. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says everyone has detectable levels of the chemicals.

Researchers studied stored blood from 399 women who gave birth to single children from April 1964 to April 1967. After adjusting for age, race and other factors, they found that women in the 90th percentile for PCB blood levels were 33 percent less likely to have a boy than women in the 10th percentile.

The paper appeared online July 15 in Environmental Health.

“Most people’s levels of PCBs are considerably lower today than they were when these samples were taken,” said Irva Hertz-Picciotto, the lead author and a professor of epidemiology at the University of California, Davis. “The bigger significance of the paper is that compounds similar to PCBs are present in flame retardants used in many products today, and are increasing at a rapid rate.

“We should be concerned and looking at some of these similar chemicals,” Dr. Hertz-Picciotto added.

READ THE STUDY HERE
http://www.ehjournal.net/content/7/1/37/abstract

Categories: Uncategorized

umm, WHAT?

July 15, 2008 · Leave a Comment

    Here’s a nice, sneaky little tidbit that, despite being published back in 2006, got very little reaction and attention so I’m revisiting this awesome industry “tip” for your reading pleasure and no doubt disgust...


    FDA Is Urged to Ban Carbon-Monoxide-Treated Meat
    By Rick Weiss
    Washington Post Staff Writer

    Monday, February 20, 2006; Page A01

Picture two steaks on a grocer’s shelf, each hermetically sealed in clear plastic wrap. One is bright pink, rimmed with a crescent of pearly white fat. The other is brown, its fat the color of a smoker’s teeth.

Which do you reach for?

The meat industry knows the answer, which is why it has quietly begun to spike meat packages with carbon monoxide.

From the Washingston Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/19/AR2006021901101.html

Categories: Burning in Hell · Organic Panic · Planet Plan
Tagged:

Buying the Farm (literally)

July 11, 2008 · Leave a Comment

In a trend that I wholeheartedly endorse and applaud, people are taking buying farm fresh one step further: they’re buying the farm!

In yesterday’s NYTs, an interesting piece about farm shares, (something that many raw milk drinkers have done for years with cows in order to get the product they want but can’t find in stores).

    BELOW, FROM THE NYT

CAMPTON TOWNSHIP, Ill. — In an environmentally conscious tweak on the typical way of getting food to the table, growing numbers of people are skipping out on grocery stores and even farmers markets and instead going right to the source by buying shares of farms.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/us/10farms.html?em&ex=1215921600&en=655d2d9570e156bb&ei=5087%0A

Categories: Baby Free & Clear · Milk (got Real?) · Organic Panic · Planet Plan
Tagged:

Wyeth wants to OWN your natural estrogen…

July 3, 2008 · 1 Comment

Ok, technically not an “eat” topic but as you all know, I do expand to include other areas where our health and well-being are affected by government and greed.

The following newsletter is reprinted from Healthtips@healthiernews.com

Last month, I told you about House Concurrent Resolution 342, which calls for the FDA to reverse its new policy classifying estriol as an unapproved new drug (6/4/08 eTip, subject line: “Breaking news on your right to choose”). This resolution gets right to the heart of the matter, stating that “restricting women’s access to medications containing estriol does not serve the public interest.”
The interest it DOES serve is that of pharmaceutical giant Wyeth, which is responsible for setting los Federales’ misguided guard dogs loose on bio-identical hormone replacement therapy (BHRT). With the bad news that continues to be revealed about synthetic forms of HRT, more and more women are opting for safe, natural versions. Wyeth obviously has quite a lot to lose from BHRT’s rise in popularity. So it’s no surprise that it filed a “citizen’s petition” with the FDA, calling for a ban on estriol and other hormones involved in BHRT — clearing the way for its own patented (and profitable) versions.
Unfortunately, the FDA took action and cracked down on compounding pharmacies formulating BHRT. Today, access to this invaluable therapy is still in serious jeopardy. While House Concurrent Resolution 342 is a step in the right direction, it needs as much support as it can get, and the more citizens there are behind it, the better the chances of it being noticed — and passed — by los Federales.
The good news is, one organization has made it even easier for you to make your voice heard. The American Association for Health Freedom has taken this issue — and Wyeth — head on. Earlier this summer, it placed a full-page ad in Roll Call, the Congressional newspaper, with the headline “Shame on you, Wyeth.” The ad blows the whistle on the company’s self-serving role in the FDA’s restriction of estriol and BHRT. You see, while Wyeth is trying to have estriol removed from compounding pharmacies here in the U.S., at the same time, the company also has a European ad campaign touting estriol as “safe treatment for menopause symptoms.”
You can view the ad by visiting the American Association for Health Freedom’s website, www.healthfreedom.net. And while you’re there, check out the in-depth and disturbing look at the timeline of events leading to the current state of affairs. The website also features a frightening table outlining Wyeth’s financial ties to supposedly “unbiased” medical organizations and women’s groups.
But even more important than the inside scoop the American Association for Health Freedom website offers is the easy link you can use to send feedback supporting House Concurrent Resolution 342 directly to your Congressmen. Look for the “Take action” section of the homepage, and click on the “Strike while the iron is hot” link. From there, scroll down the page and click on the words “Now is the time to act.” Then, simply fill in the information at the right-hand side of the page and the American Association for Health Freedom will send a form letter supporting House Concurrent Resolution 342 directly to your Congressmen.
Once again, it’s imperative for you to make your voice heard right away (and continue to send frequent reminders), letting your representatives know that you support House Concurrent Resolution 342 and the freedom of health care choice that it represents—and that you expect them to do the same.

Categories: Burning in Hell · Organic Panic · Planet Plan
Tagged:

Veggies: Why Raw Isn’t Always Best

July 3, 2008 · Leave a Comment

I don’t want to step on any toes over here but I need to be honest.
Over the past few years, the Raw Foods fad has been closely aligned with the Whole Foods trend, the Local Foods wisdom, and even the Organic Foods movement.

Know what? In reality, they aren’t necessarily connected, or even similar.

Want my opinion?
I love raw milk. Even raw eggs. I LOVE salads. Eat a huge one every day for lunch and put a bunch of things in it; nuts, some veggies, some cheese, beans or eggs. It varies in exact content but for the most part, it’s raw. Having said that, and happily admitting to generally being a veg-a-holic, I have a little problem with making the leap between “many” and “all”.
For a perfect example take the tomato. I adore raw tomatos, freshly sliced, a pinch of salt, perhaps with a leaf of fresh basil ummmmmm. salsa, pico de gallo, oh don’t get me started.
I also love cooked tomatoes: sauces, tagines, ragus. yum.

On the other hand, broccoli? Not so much with the raw there. Same goes for beets, cauliflower and certain other foods. To me some foods raw are just too, well, RAW, you know?
The flavor seems locked inside, somehow. And let’s not even talk about the gas.
Yup, I gotta say that, for me, some things just need a bit of heat, a touch of the grill, a little cooking.

    Finally, a little vindication after so many tut-tutts from all my Raw Foods pals!

The following is from the New York Times

…“There is a misperception that raw foods are always going to be better,” says Steven K. Clinton, a nutrition researcher and professor of internal medicine in the medical oncology division at Ohio State University. “For fruits and vegetables, a lot of times a little bit of cooking and a little bit of processing actually can be helpful.”

The amount and type of nutrients that eventually end up in the vegetables are affected by a number of factors before they reach the plate, including where and how they were grown, processed and stored before being bought. Then, it’s up to you.

No single cooking or preparation method is best. Water-soluble nutrients like vitamins C and B and a group of nutrients called polyphenolics are often lost in processing. For instance, studies show that after six months, frozen cherries have lost as much as 50 percent of anthocyanins, the healthful compounds found in the pigment of red and blue fruits and vegetables. Fresh spinach loses 64 percent of its vitamin C after cooking. Canned peas and carrots lose 85 percent to 95 percent of their vitamin C, according to data compiled by the University of California, Davis.

Fat-soluble compounds like vitamins A, D, E and K and the antioxidant compounds called carotenoids are less likely to leach out in water. Cooking also breaks down the thick cell walls of plants, releasing the contents for the body to use. That is why processed tomato products have higher lycopene content than fresh tomatoes…

TO READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE, CLICK HERE:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/20/health/nutrition/20well.html?ref=health

Categories: Milk (got Real?) · Organic Panic · Planet Plan
Tagged:

Tomatoes, Beef and more “suspect” foods

July 2, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Just in time for the Fourth of July weekend, concerns about Salmonella tomatoes and E. coli beef go and ruin it all…My favorite part is where they say be careful about possible other sources of Salmonella but don’t even hint at what the hell ELSE they think might be tainted!

Yeah, better to let people get sick before warning them and getting those big suppliers all pissed off…

    From Today’s NYT:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Adding to tomato confusion, the government is about to start testing numerous other types of fresh produce in the hunt for the source of the nation’s record salmonella outbreak — even as it insists tomatoes remain the leading suspect.

Investigators are mum on exactly what other vegetables are getting tracked.

Items commonly served with fresh tomatoes is the only hint Food and Drug Administration food safety chief Dr. David Acheson would give, calling it “irresponsible” to point a finger until he has more evidence that some other food really deserves the extra scrutiny.
“Tomatoes aren’t off the hook,” he stressed. “It’s just that there is clearly a need to think beyond tomatoes.”

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Tomatoes-Salmonella.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

    ALSO FROM TODAY’S NYT:

Supermarkets across the country are pulling from their shelves more than 530,000 pounds of beef that may be contaminated with E. coli in the wake of an Agriculture Department warning that the beef supplied by a Nebraska company may be responsible for at least 40 illnesses.

The company, Nebraska Beef Ltd. of Omaha, recalled the beef produced since May after some of its products, sold by the Kroger Company with sell-by dates of May 21 to July 5, was linked to reports of illnesses in Ohio and Michigan, the Agriculture Department’s Food Safety and Inspection Service said on Tuesday.

In addition to Michigan, Nebraska Beef reported some of the contaminated products were distributed in Illinois, New York and Pennsylvania. Other beef products were reportedly sent to Colorado and Texas for further processing, although it was not immediately clear whether any contaminated beef was sold in the other states.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/03/us/03recallcnd.html

Categories: Burning in Hell · Organic Panic · Planet Plan
Tagged: